Mark Simms....................

[Stone Valiant]

Somehow you know that's not true - most of the followers will bottle it and it will only be a few hardcore left moaning, who will return with any success.

 

Actually I do know it to be true. It is you who is fooling himself if you believe the campaign for change is only a minority handful. You are just as out of touch as the board!

[Fosse69]

I think people are more angry than they were an hour ago!:D:

 

What have I missed?

[BOSLEM LAD]

We said on Wednesday that it was the only chance to get rid and if we didn't then we would never be rid of them and it is certainly looking that way.

 

I just hope season ticket holders are happy with how things are being run:(

 

Not at all mate, want the board out full stop. But i will not cut off the life blood of the club and plunge us back into admin....

[AVIM]

Errr maybe its because that is what Glenn said MANY times,surely you dont think he would lie:ohmy:

 

Are you deliberately taking the pish? Of course he would lie. Business, business business.

[AVIM]

People are more angry now, than last week.

 

I don't know if that make a difference. If you voted "pro board" last time, you are likely to be very happy about the MA news. Why change your vote?

[AVIM]

I actually think you're wrong....unless you're talking life changing amounts of cash I'm not actually sure that they're interested in profit.

 

You may be right, in so much as profit is not the motivator. But why let something go at a value far less than it is worth to you? Nobody likes to take a loss, even if they aren't after a profit.

 

Lets say Mr bratts' chairmanship is worth quater of a mil to him, in terms of the personal gratification he gets from it. Why sell for 50k?

[Conrad]

I thought it was interesting hear him say that directors, and ex directors, are getting in touch with shareholders with large holdings offering to buy them, they are definately hiding something and are running scared

 

why buy existing shares of shareholders when they could buy new shares

something they repeatedly accused mo chaudry of trying to do.

[werstayinup]

Are you deliberately taking the pish? Of course he would lie. Business, business business.

 

So he lied to Vale fans on here then when BEGGING them to buy shares?

[VantaaVale]

why buy existing shares of shareholders when they could buy new shares

something they repeatedly accused mo chaudry of trying to do.

 

Simple.

 

New shares cannot be issued.

 

Old shares can be bought privately, but not authorised until there is a functional board.

 

So.. we have the Broxap situation again. A vote is about to take place. This time it is not to save their skins, this time it is to get Adams on the board. The vote is going to be close and the board want to influence the vote.

 

I am disgusted with the behaviour of people who are, imo, abusing their position.

[Conrad]

Simple.

New shares cannot be issued.

 

Old shares can be bought privately, but not authorised until there is a functional board.

 

So.. we have the Broxap situation again. A vote is about to take place. This time it is not to save their skins, this time it is to get Adams on the board. The vote is going to be close and the board want to influence the vote.

 

I am disgusted with the behaviour of people who are, imo, abusing their position.

 

Fair point.

[melv]

why buy existing shares of shareholders when they could buy new shares

something they repeatedly accused mo chaudry of trying to do.

 

Been thinking about that but still cant work out why.

 

 

 

Now answered by vantaavale

[bogie12secs]

Tone, even if the scummers get their way, we'll burn the *******s!:D

 

We're all Vale aren't we!;)

you have hit the mark ther tosh WERE VALE ARNT WE not them people.

[carpetman123]

Simple.

 

New shares cannot be issued.

 

Old shares can be bought privately, but not authorised until there is a functional board.

 

So.. we have the Broxap situation again. A vote is about to take place. This time it is not to save their skins, this time it is to get Adams on the board. The vote is going to be close and the board want to influence the vote.

 

I am disgusted with the behaviour of people who are, imo, abusing their position.

 

Well whats to stop Mo doing exactly the same, him doing a deal with existing large shareholders paying at the moment for their proxies to vote like the board did with Broxap??

[Guest Ewing]

Well whats to stop Mo doing exactly the same, him doing a deal with existing large shareholders paying at the moment for their proxies to vote like the board did with Broxap??

 

Because the board have the ability to approve their own purchase of shares and veto any attempt Mo might make to purchase shares.

[sheffield61]

What a nightmare they all are......Pratt says he'll go ''If'' the fans don't want him? A vote of NO confidence on his CV last week..He GONE yet!?....:(