onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Chuck the Key away.......Scumbags.

Jimmy

By Jimmy
in Off-topic

Recommended Posts

JOHNNYAITCH Newbie

JOHNNYAITCH

Posted
Posted
A serious case review by Coventry Safeguarding Children Board published today found that police received 26 reports of domestic violence at Daniel Pelka's family home in the city whilst teachers failed to spot signs that he was being beaten and starved.

Social workers proved too willing to believe his manipulative and aggressive parents' claims that his injuries were the results of accidents and a paediatrician did not link Daniel's dramatic weight loss with neglect.

Can't believe that nobody is held accountable.

 

I think part of it is social wokrers etc being scared to take a child into care mistakenly and the consequencs for them and the organisations that they work for

 

Plus a lack of joined up thinking/information sharing operationally

 

I am most disappointed with the school; they saw him regulalry, would have seen his behaviour regularly, seen changes in him over time..unlike others who would only have seen a snapshot of his situation or behaviour and would be dealing with lots of other cases..the school would surely NOT have dozens of children in such situations? Did they do all that they could, even within a flawed system?

 

I feel that ultimately the cause is the system and the culture within the system and that whilst systemic issues wil be addressed, cultural issues wil remain unresolved and it's only a matter of time before this happens again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert

For Us All Veteran

For Us All

Posted
Posted
I think part of it is social wokrers etc being scared to take a child into care mistakenly and the consequencs for them and the organisations that they work for

 

Plus a lack of joined up thinking/information sharing operationally

 

I am most disappointed with the school; they saw him regulalry, would have seen his behaviour regularly, seen changes in him over time..unlike others who would only have seen a snapshot of his situation or behaviour and would be dealing with lots of other cases..the school would surely NOT have dozens of children in such situations? Did they do all that they could, even within a flawed system?

 

I feel that ultimately the cause is the system and the culture within the system and that whilst systemic issues wil be addressed, cultural issues wil remain unresolved and it's only a matter of time before this happens again

 

It beggars belief that despite Daniel's noticeable injuries,nobody at the school thought to ever ask him if he had problems,what do teachers do these days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
For Us All Veteran

For Us All

Posted
Posted
A she got the payout cos it was handled badly by Ed Balls whio was too interested in playing politics and beinmg seen to look dedcisive..idiot

 

But she's got some gall in accepting the payment even if legally she is entitled to it

 

I know it's only in the Daily Rag but it is reported that she demanded £1.5m,does she have no shame?

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2479246/Disgraced-Shoesmith-demanded-1-5million-Backlash-pay-out.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnJames Enthusiast

JohnJames

Posted
Posted
I know it's only in the Daily Rag but it is reported that she demanded £1.5m,does she have no shame?

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2479246/Disgraced-Shoesmith-demanded-1-5million-Backlash-pay-out.html

 

Errr not wishing to disparage the Daily Lying Tory Mail. She has probably aske for maximum compensation which was £71,000 at the time of her claim(she was on£135k a year) She has probably also claimed for loss of earnings and pension. According to the BBC its a lot less than the £600k being banded about. If Ed Balls had kept his nose out and let the council go through the proper disciplinary procedure and dismiss her that way she would have not been able to pursue a claim. It serves Ed Balls and the council right. Two wrongs don't make a right. If they had followed the law instead of acting above it there wouldn't have been a problem. Ed Balls and the CEO of the council should be sacked for the monumental **** up. MPs are there to follow the law not make it up on the hoof as are CEO's

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JOHNNYAITCH Newbie

JOHNNYAITCH

Posted
Posted
Errr not wishing to disparage the Daily Lying Tory Mail.

 

Tut tut..Daily Star and the Mirror mention similar figure too..looks like the redoubtable Daily Mail has it right again ;)

 

There is no evidence cos of lack of due process being followed that she was incompetent nor evil/wicked..blame Ed Balls for this payout as he was too interested in trying to look good to the electorate

 

An alternative slant http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article3908025.ece

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
For Us All Veteran

For Us All

Posted
Posted
Would be good to hear off the record/anonymously explanstions from the teachers as to why they didn't talk to him etc..I say anonymously so that they will be honest and we can all learn from this

 

At last some action,the headmaster has been suspended.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10437555/Head-of-Daniel-Pelkas-primary-school-suspended.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Reporting Posts and other information

    Rules - This forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the orange button. Guests can contact us here. If you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save. Please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first.

    Use - This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum is not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC. OVF reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. If you spot an offensive post please report it to the admin team (instructions are above).

    Adverts - This site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. If you require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people | Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk

  • Friends of OVF

Advert



×
×
  • Create New...